VS04b Results
Submitted checklist.txt and checklist.tex is also available
  [Summary | AIPS | Difmap ]
Analyst: Zhi-Qiang Shen
Date Prepared: 19-10-1999
 

Summary
 
Observation code : VS04b    AIPS Version : 15OCT98 (15APR99)   
Date of Observation : 1998/191    Difmap Version : 2.3c 
Source Name : J0334-40    vsop_difmap used : Yes 
Calibration Source(s) :          
Ground telescopes : HartRAO, Mop, Usuda64  Model Fitted to data : Yes 
Tracking Station(s) : UZ,RZ    Image made : Yes 
Correlator : Penticton         

 
Abstract
No fringes were found to Mop telescope. This resulted in a 2 GRTs experiment.

Fringes were detected on Halca during the entire RZ pass (4~hrs). The ground Usuda64 was on source for only ~1hr. Seems Usuda64 had problem during the observations since the correlated flux densities on the baselines to Usuad64 had an unreasonable decrease with time when compared to another ground telescope HartRAO.

The image was made to this limited dataset with the phase self-calibration only.

A point source model was fit the calibrated data.

Model
Flux (Jy)
Radius (mas)
Theta (deg)
Major (mas)
Axial ratio
Phi (deg)
TB (10^12 K)
0.271852 0.0139059 -141.758 0 0 0 0.0000
(*) Quoted Brightness temperatures assume Gaussian components and are in the local (z=0) frame.



AIPS Data Reduction Notes
 
Task
Adverbs
CL
in
SN
in
CL
out
SN
out
Comments
FITLD douvcomp=1;dotable=1
 
 
 
 
load the uv FITS data with 15APR99 version AIPS to overcome the timestamp problem when the first FITS file ran cross the 24-hour boundary. Later data reduction was kept with 15OCT98 version. 
MSORT sort='TB'
 
 
 
 
sort the data to 'TB' order 
INDXR cparm(3)=1
 
 
 
index uv data with 1 min CL entry interval 
TACOP
 
 
protect original CL1 
ANTAB
 
 
 
 
determine the Tsys and gain curve (see ANTAB.TXT file). Tsys=95K for Halca. 
APCAL opcode=' '
 
 
 
generate an amplitude calibration solution table 
CLCAL opcode='CALI'
interpol=' '
refant=1
 
apply amplitude calibration solution 
FRING docalib=1
flagv=-1;solint=4;refant=1
aparm=2,0,0,0,0,1,2,0
dparm=1,0,0,0,1,0
antwt=1,1,30,1
 
 
FFT fringe searching (after several trial runs) 
CLCAL opcode='CALP';interpol='AMBG';smotype='VLBI'
refant=1
 
apply FFT solutions 
FRING docalib=1
flagv=-1;solint=4;refant=1
aparm=2,0,0,0,0,1,3,0
dparm=1,0
antwt=1,1,30,1
 
 
(FFT+LS) fringe fitting 
CLCAL opcode='CALP';interpol='AMBG';smotype='VLBI'
refant=1
 
apply full fringe fitting solutions 
TACOP
 
 
save calibration table CL7 
CLCOR antenna=0;opcode='GAIN';clcorprm=0.91,0
 
 
Penticton gain correction 
TASAV
 
 
 
 
copy all extension tables to a dummy file 
SPLIT docalib=1;douvcomp=1;aparm=2,0,0,1,0
 
 
 
make calibrated single-source data files: J0334-40.SPLIT 
FITTP
 
 
 
 
export each single-source file in FITS format to disk file for further imaging analysis 

AIPS Input Files
INDXR.TXT
ANTAB.TXT
Comments
- None -

AIPS Output Files
PRTAN.LIS
LISTR.LIS
DTSUM_0.LIS
DTSUM_1.LIS
UVPLT_UV.PS
UVPLT_UVD.PS
UVPLT_UVPA.PS
SN_APCAL_AMP_2.PS
SN_APCAL_AMP_1.PS
SN_FRING01_DEL_1.PS
SN_FRING01_DEL_2.PS
SN_FRING01_RAT_1.PS
SN_FRING01_RAT_2.PS
SN_FRING01_SNR_1.PS
SN_FRING01_SNR_2.PS
SN_CALIB_DEL_1.PS
SN_CALIB_DEL_2.PS
SN_CALIB_RAT_1.PS
SN_CALIB_RAT_2.PS
SN_CALIB_SNR_1.PS
SN_CALIB_SNR_2.PS
SN_CALIB_PHA_1.PS
SN_CALIB_PHA_2.PS
POSSM01_AP_2.PS
VPLOT_AP_1.PS
POSSM01_AP_1.PS
VPLOT_AP_2.PS



Difmap Data Reduction Notes
Phase selfcal applied? Yes
Global amplitude selfcal (gscal) applied? No
Amplitude selfcal on non-global timescales used? No
Modelfit made and saved? Yes
Image Made and saved? Yes
Comments on Difmap processing
average data over 30 sec (uvaver 30,true)

raise the weight of HALCA (selfant VSOP_SC,false,100)

keep non-closing data during phase self-cal (selfflag false,3,4)

clean and phase self-cal with uniform weighting (uvw 2,-1 ... etc)

switch to natural weighting to clean more flux (uvw 0,-1 ... etc)

(*NO* amplitude self-cal with eventually only 3 antennas available)

switch back to obtain a uniform weighting clean image: peak=0.296 Jy/beam, RMS=9.3 mJy/beam; beam=0.438 mas x 0.249 mas @ 15.8 deg

Both point source and circular gaussian models were tried to fit the calibrated data. Finally, a point source model was accepted.


Image
Ampl, Phase vs (u,v) Distance
PS (59 kb)
GIF (8 kb)
Ampl, Phase vs Time
PS (341 kb)
GIF 1, 2
(u,v) Coverage
PS (31 kb)
GIF (5 kb)
Closure Phase vs Time
PS (156 kb)
GIF 1
Clean Image
PS (30 kb)
GIF (100 kb)
Modelfit
Ampl, Phase vs (u,v) Distance
PS (59 kb)
GIF (8 kb)
Ampl, Phase vs Time
PS (340 kb)
GIF 1, 2
(u,v) Coverage
PS (31 kb)
GIF (5 kb)
Closure Phase vs Time
PS (156 kb)
GIF 1
Image with model components
PS (30 kb)
GIF (6 kb)

More details on the Images and Modelfits are found in this page.

Model
Flux (Jy)
Radius (mas)
Theta (deg)
Major (mas)
Axial ratio
Phi (deg)
TB (10^12 K)
0.271852 0.0139059 -141.758 0 0 0 0.0000
(*) Quoted Brightness temperatures assume Gaussian components and are in the local (z=0) frame.



Last updated on Tue Oct 19 13:31:29 GMT 1999
by db_results.pl version 0.2.0.