VS04j Results
Submitted checklist.txt and checklist.tex is also available
  [Summary | AIPS | Difmap ]
Analyst: Shinjii HORIUCHI
Date Prepared: 28-04-1999
 

Summary
 
Observation code : VS04j    AIPS Version : 15OCT99   
Date of Observation : 1999/118    Difmap Version : 2.3c 
Source Name : J1048+7143    vsop_difmap used : Yes 
Calibration Source(s) : 0212+735         
Ground telescopes : TR, SH  Model Fitted to data : Yes 
Tracking Station(s) : TZ, UZ, GZ    Image made : Yes 
Correlator : Penticton         

 
Abstract
Good signals with all two GRTs, TR, SH, and the Space from all three tracking stations. However the ground baselines show very low amplitude about 0.2-3 Jy. Since the number of baselines are limited, we can not use grobal amplitude correction and amplitude-selfcal. It seems better to check groung calibrators as well. [Aditional Note: I re-uploads this file with multiply 8 for TR and 4 for SH gains by CLCOR to recover resonable amplitude. This experiment is originaly correlated with 32 channels but relation to unexpected low amplitude is unclear. S.H. 2000/01/12]
Model
Flux (Jy)
Radius (mas)
Theta (deg)
Major (mas)
Axial ratio
Phi (deg)
TB (10^12 K)
1.34328 0.00214467 62.5908 0.290330 0.513670 -28.4842 1.5140
(*) Quoted Brightness temperatures assume Gaussian components and are in the local (z=0) frame.



AIPS Data Reduction Notes
 
Task
Adverbs
CL
in
SN
in
CL
out
SN
out
Comments
FITLD
 
 
 
 
Files can not be concatinated because of wrong obs. date. 
ACCOR
 
 
 
 
Files can not be concatinated because of wrong obs. date. 
INDXR
 
 
 
 
CLCAL
 
 
FRING Solint=4, APARM(7)=0.1,
DPARM=1,6000,300,0, REFANT=2
 
 
clear detection eventhough wider search windows 
CLCAL
 
 
ANTAB
 
 
 
 
 
APCAL
 
 
 
 
CLCAL SMOTYPE = 'AMPL'
 
 
SPLIT
 
 
 
 
FITTP
 
 
 
 
 

AIPS Input Files
Comments
- None -

AIPS Output Files
PRTAN.LIS
LISTR.LIS
DTSUM_0.LIS
DTSUM_1.LIS
UVPLT_UV.PS
UVPLT_UVD.PS
UVPLT_UVPA.PS
SN_ACCOR_AMP_1.PS
SN_ACCOR_AMP_2.PS
SN_APCAL_AMP_2.PS
SN_APCAL_AMP_1.PS
SN_FRING01_DEL_1.PS
SN_FRING01_DEL_2.PS
SN_FRING01_RAT_1.PS
SN_FRING01_RAT_2.PS
SN_FRING01_SNR_1.PS
SN_FRING01_SNR_2.PS
SN_FRING02_DEL_1.PS
SN_FRING02_DEL_2.PS
SN_FRING02_RAT_1.PS
SN_FRING02_RAT_2.PS
SN_FRING02_SNR_1.PS
SN_FRING02_SNR_2.PS
SN_CALIB_DEL_1.PS
SN_CALIB_DEL_2.PS
SN_CALIB_RAT_1.PS
SN_CALIB_RAT_2.PS
SN_CALIB_SNR_1.PS
SN_CALIB_SNR_2.PS
SN_CALIB_PHA_1.PS
SN_CALIB_PHA_2.PS



Difmap Data Reduction Notes
Phase selfcal applied? Yes
Global amplitude selfcal (gscal) applied? No
Amplitude selfcal on non-global timescales used? No
Modelfit made and saved? Yes
Image Made and saved? Yes
Comments on Difmap processing
The source is very and a modelfit was applied with one gaussians. Gscal can not be applied because of limited number of baselines. The ground baselines show very low amplitude. It seems better to check groung calibrator.

Image
Ampl, Phase vs (u,v) Distance
PS (28 kb)
GIF (6 kb)
Ampl, Phase vs Time
PS (154 kb)
GIF 1, 2, 3
(u,v) Coverage
PS (16 kb)
GIF (5 kb)
Closure Phase vs Time
PS (101 kb)
GIF 1
Clean Image
PS (32 kb)
GIF (75 kb)
Modelfit
Ampl, Phase vs (u,v) Distance
PS (28 kb)
GIF (6 kb)
Ampl, Phase vs Time
PS (154 kb)
GIF 1, 2, 3
(u,v) Coverage
PS (16 kb)
GIF (5 kb)
Closure Phase vs Time
PS (101 kb)
GIF 1
Image with model components
PS (33 kb)
GIF (7 kb)

More details on the Images and Modelfits are found in this page.

Model
Flux (Jy)
Radius (mas)
Theta (deg)
Major (mas)
Axial ratio
Phi (deg)
TB (10^12 K)
1.34328 0.00214467 62.5908 0.290330 0.513670 -28.4842 1.5140
(*) Quoted Brightness temperatures assume Gaussian components and are in the local (z=0) frame.



Last updated on Wed Jan 12 09:26:50 GMT 2000
by db_results.pl version 0.2.0.