VS07k Results
Submitted checklist.txt and checklist.tex is also available
  [Summary | AIPS | Difmap ]
Analyst: Ed Fomalont
Date Prepared: 13-08-99
 

Summary
 
Observation code : VS07k    AIPS Version : 15OCT99 
Date of Observation : 1999/127    Difmap Version : Not used 
Source Name : J0958+47    vsop_difmap used : No 
Calibration Source(s) : 0923+392         
Ground telescopes : NRAO_140, NOTO  Model Fitted to data : No 
Tracking Station(s) : GZ, TZ    Image made : No 
Correlator : Penticton         

 
Abstract
1. Removed delay and rate offset from original data. Values from both tracking passes about the same: -250 nsec and -2 mHz.

2. Flagged all Torun data.

3. Used nominal gain values for VSOP, GB and NT. Used measured Tsys for GB and NT. See ANTAB.TXT. However, these values did not give expected flux density levels. More of this below

4. Fringe fitting of 16-ch, 2-sec data was excellent. After minor editing, good results obtained with 2-min integrations using FRING.

5. Here is the amplitude problem:

SOURCE Expected Correlated Flux Density at 100 Mlambda NT - GB baseline

VLBA obs These Observ

0923+392 11 Jy 2.4 Jy J0958+47 1.6 Ju 0.3 Jy

In otherwords, the correlated flux density on the ground baseline is about 20% of that expected. Both sources have not varied much over the last few years.

Since there is only one ground baseline, it is difficult to determine how to fix the ground antenna gains. The adhoc values of

NRAO_140 x 2.5 NOTO x 1.5

gives somewhat consistent results, including the HALCA baselines.

6. The calibrated data base contains the above adhoc gain corrections to NRAO_140 and NOTO. No changes made to HALCA Parameters.

7. In view of the uncertain gain calibration, no difmaping and modeling was done. I think the amplitude versus u-v plots is probably okay for statistical purposes.



AIPS Data Reduction Notes
 
- None -

AIPS Input Files
ANTAB.TXT Comments
NRAO_140 gain values not available. George calculated it for me.

Additional Files
NameDescription
AMP_CALThis plot comes directly from the aplication of ANTAB.TXT. Both IF's are identical. This is being shown since there appears to be a gain calibration error for ant 2 and 4.
SN_CAL_DEL1Antenna 4 (NRAO_140) is the reference. Plotted are residual fringe fits for VSOP_SC and NOTO. Two minute integrations were used and, with some spotty editing, nice results were obtained. Some comments are: (1) The jump in the NOTO SNR is strange. Perhaps, it is related to the incorrect gain calibration. (2). The 30 nsec jumps in ante 1 and 2 occur in both IF's with good SNR, so they have been left and calibrated out.
SN_CAL_DEL2see above
SN_CAL_RAT_1see above
SN_CAL_RAT_2see above
SN_PHASsee above
SN_CAL_SNR1see above
SN_CAL_SNR2see above
UV0923+392Correlated flux density of 0923+292. It is 2.4 Jy. It should have been at 100 mLambda, about 11 Jy, based on the VLA data base and the VLBA observations. For J0958, all baselines are shown in the figure. The heavy dots at 100 Mlambda are for the NOTO-GB baseline and is 0.3 Jy. According to the VLBA image, this source was slightly resolved with a flux density of 1.5 Jy. Baseline VSOP-NOTO has the higher flux density than the Baseline VSOP-GB. Since these two u-v tracks are similar, one suspects that the GB gain is more in error than the NOTO gain.
UV0948+47see above
0927+390.psThe VLBA pre-launch results indicating that the flux density derived in this survey experiment is too low.
0958+472.pssee above
UVCOR_J0958+47Here is the correlated visibility with baseline for the source, after the adhoc gain corrections. The flux density of 0923+392 is now about 10 Jy which is okay.
TASAV.FITSDescription of the tables used. SN1: Contains the apriori gain values from ANTAB.TXT (GC1 and TY1) CL2: CLCAL of CL1 + SN1 using 2PT FG1: The flag file. Mostly flagging out Torun and and little of the other telescopes to get nice continuity SN2: The FRING results. 2-min integration CL3: CLCAL of CL2 + SN2 using 2PT CL4: CLCOR ANT 2 gain bumped by 1.5; ANT 4 gain bumped by 2.5 (adhoc)
J0958+47_FOMALONT_AIPS.FITSJ0958+47 file is split data using CL4 above. It is then average to 30-second sampling. J0923+392 is the bit of data after the calibration. Only baseline NOTO-NRAO_140 is available.
0923+392_FOMALONT_AIPS.FITSsee above

AIPS Output Files
PRTAN.LIS
LISTR.LIS
UVPLT_UV.PS
UVPLT_UVD.PS
UVPLT_UVPA.P
WEIGHTS.PS



Difmap Data Reduction Notes
Phase selfcal applied? No
Global amplitude selfcal (gscal) applied? No
Amplitude selfcal on non-global timescales used? No
Modelfit made and saved? No
Image Made and saved? No
Comments on Difmap processing




Last updated on Fri Aug 13 20:33:20 GMT 1999
by db_results.pl version 0.2.0.