VS07t Results
Submitted checklist.txt and checklist.tex is also available
  [Summary | AIPS | Difmap ]
Analyst: Glenn Piner
Date Prepared: 02-11-1999
 

Summary
 
Observation code : VS07t    AIPS Version : 31DEC99   
Date of Observation : 1999/222    Difmap Version : 2.3c 
Source Name : J0115-01    vsop_difmap used : Yes 
Calibration Source(s) : 0202+149         
Ground telescopes : MP, HO, SH  Model Fitted to data : Yes 
Tracking Station(s) : GZ, TZ, RZ    Image made : Yes 
Correlator : Penticton         

 
Abstract
Found fringes to HALCA throughout the experiment using standard parameters in FRING. There was a delay jump of 200-300 nsec between the TZ and GZ tracking pass. Imaging this source was rather difficult. After cleaning the central region there was still considerable flux missing from the short baselines and a number of nearly equally bright residuals. Windowed the two brightest residuals, which also happen to be in the jet direction seen in the USNO image (if the northwest component is the core). Also did several iterations with natural weighting to more closely approach the short baseline flux. A 3-component circular model was fit to the data. The total flux density was only about 0.5 Jy, compared to 0.9 Jy from the AT light curve.
Model
Flux (Jy)
Radius (mas)
Theta (deg)
Major (mas)
Axial ratio
Phi (deg)
TB (10^12 K)
0.142087 2.03093 -51.8755 0.309970 1.00000 -50.1945 0.0722
0.170054 1.04001 -51.4475 0.464767 1.00000 -42.7094 0.0384
0.155938 0.214537 -19.6007 0.141646 1.00000 -47.2906 0.3793
(*) Quoted Brightness temperatures assume Gaussian components and are in the local (z=0) frame.



AIPS Data Reduction Notes
 
- None -

AIPS Input Files
INDXR.TXT
ANTAB.TXT
Comments
- None -

AIPS Output Files
PRTAN.LIS
LISTR.LIS
DTSUM_0.LIS
DTSUM_1.LIS
UVPLT_UV.PS
UVPLT_UVD.PS
UVPLT_UVPA.PS
SN_APCAL_AMP_2.PS
SN_APCAL_AMP_1.PS
SN_CALIB_DEL_1.PS
SN_CALIB_DEL_2.PS
SN_CALIB_RAT_1.PS
SN_CALIB_RAT_2.PS
SN_CALIB_SNR_1.PS
SN_CALIB_SNR_2.PS
SN_CALIB_PHA_1.PS
SN_CALIB_PHA_2.PS
VPLOT_AP_1.PS
VPLOT_AP_2.PS
POSSM01_AP_1.PS
POSSM02_AP_1.PS
POSSM03_AP_1.PS



Difmap Data Reduction Notes
Phase selfcal applied? No
Global amplitude selfcal (gscal) applied? No
Amplitude selfcal on non-global timescales used? No
Modelfit made and saved? Yes
Image Made and saved? Yes
Comments on Difmap processing

Image
Ampl, Phase vs (u,v) Distance
PS (67 kb)
GIF (8 kb)
Ampl, Phase vs Time
PS (200 kb)
GIF 1, 2
(u,v) Coverage
PS (36 kb)
GIF (5 kb)
Closure Phase vs Time
PS (137 kb)
GIF 1
Clean Image
PS (32 kb)
GIF (103 kb)
Modelfit
Ampl, Phase vs (u,v) Distance
PS (67 kb)
GIF (8 kb)
Ampl, Phase vs Time
PS (200 kb)
GIF 1, 2
(u,v) Coverage
PS (36 kb)
GIF (5 kb)
Closure Phase vs Time
PS (136 kb)
GIF 1
Image with model components
PS (33 kb)
GIF (7 kb)

More details on the Images and Modelfits are found in this page.

Model
Flux (Jy)
Radius (mas)
Theta (deg)
Major (mas)
Axial ratio
Phi (deg)
TB (10^12 K)
0.142087 2.03093 -51.8755 0.309970 1.00000 -50.1945 0.0722
0.170054 1.04001 -51.4475 0.464767 1.00000 -42.7094 0.0384
0.155938 0.214537 -19.6007 0.141646 1.00000 -47.2906 0.3793
(*) Quoted Brightness temperatures assume Gaussian components and are in the local (z=0) frame.



Last updated on Mon Nov 22 08:37:43 GMT 1999
by db_results.pl version 0.2.0.