VS07V1 Results
Submitted checklist.txt and checklist.tex is also available |
[Summary | AIPS | Difmap ] |
Abstract
Weak HALCA solutions for the 2nd half of the experiment. |
|
|
in |
in |
out |
out |
|
FITLD | clint = 0.25 digicor = -1 delcorr = -1 |
|
|
|
|
|
INDXR | cparm = 0, 0, 0.25; |
|
|
|
|
|
ANTAB | infile='antab.txt' |
|
|
|
|
|
APCAL |
|
|
|
|
||
CLCAL | refant=1; |
|
|
|
|
Amplitude calibration solutions applied. Mopra as ref |
FRING | docal -1; dparm 2,300,300,0.5,0;aparm(7)=0.1;solint 5,10,15 |
|
|
|
|
Full range searched |
FRING | solint 10;ant 1 2 3 4 0 |
|
|
|
|
GRTs |
SNSMO | bparm 0 0 0.66 0.66;cparm 0 0 0.5 0.5 0 0 0 30 10 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
SNEDT |
|
|
|
|
||
CLCAL | refant=1;opc 'calp' |
|
|
|
|
|
CALIB | ant 1 2 3 4;solint 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
FRING | solint 5;ant 1 2 3 4 0;refant 4 |
|
|
|
|
GRTs |
SNSMO | bparm 0 0 1/6 1/6;cparm 0 0 0.5 0.5 0 0 0 5 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
CLCAL | refant=4;opc 'calp'; interp 'ambg' |
|
|
|
|
Tried all combinations. Hobart has poor phase at start. |
CALIB | ant 1 2 3 4;solint 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
CLCAL | refant=4;opc 'calp'; interp '' |
|
|
|
|
|
FRING | dparm 2,0,0,0.5,0;aparm(7)=0.1;solint 10;dofit 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
SNSMO | bparm 0 0 1/6 1;cparm 0 0 0.5 0.5 0 0 30 10 |
|
|
|
|
Smooth the delay heavily |
CLCAL | opc '';interp 'ambg' |
|
|
|
|
|
CALIB | dofit 5;ante -1 0;solint 3;refa 4 |
|
|
|
|
Hobart has no real signal |
CLCAL | interpo '';opc 'calp' |
|
|
|
|
So to get the cal source as well |
SPLIT | aparm(1)=2 0; |
|
|
|
|
Av within IF. Only the target has valid sols |
FITTP |
|
|
|
|
Data written out for analysis in Difmap |
AIPS Input Files
ANTAB.TXT | Comments - None - |
Additional Files
Name | Description |
SUR7V1.0JP | Survey run file |
AIPS Output Files
Phase selfcal applied? | Yes |
Global amplitude selfcal (gscal) applied? | No |
Amplitude selfcal on non-global timescales used? | No |
Modelfit made and saved? | Yes |
Image Made and saved? | Yes |
Comments on Difmap processing
Selfcal on a 5 minute timescale. Used a scalant of 0.72 to Hobart. Alternate solutions are possible, but this requires the minimum changes. This implies a rather unbelievably low Tsys of Hobart. No variability info, flux at 120 is 0.7, rather than 0.5. Short baselines seem correct. Model agrees with PLS and UNO ones. |
Image | ||||
Ampl, Phase vs (u,v) Distance PS (52 kb) JPEG (44 kb) |
Ampl, Phase vs Time PS (180 kb) JPEG 1, 2, 3 |
(u,v) Coverage PS (28 kb) JPEG (27 kb) | Closure Phase vs Time PS (242 kb) JPEG 1, 2 |
Clean Image PS (34 kb) JPEG (55 kb) |
Modelfit | ||||
Ampl, Phase vs (u,v) Distance PS (52 kb) JPEG (43 kb) |
Ampl, Phase vs Time PS (182 kb) JPEG 1, 2, 3 |
(u,v) Coverage PS (28 kb) JPEG (27 kb) | Closure Phase vs Time PS (243 kb) JPEG 1, 2 |
Image with model components PS (33 kb) JPEG (38 kb) |
More details on the Images and Modelfits are found in this page.