VS10P1 Results
Submitted checklist.txt and checklist.tex is also available |
[Summary | AIPS | Difmap ] |
Abstract
No space fringes. This source has a SUMMS position and a constant (0.7) flux at ATCA. The flux between HH-HO is ~ 0.3 Jy. A 0.7 mas source is consistent. |
|
|
in |
in |
out |
out |
|
FITLD | clint = 0.25 digicor = -1 delcorr = -1 |
|
|
|
|
|
INDXR | cparm = 0, 0, 0.25; |
|
|
|
|
|
ANTAB | infile='antab.txt' |
|
|
|
|
|
APCAL |
|
|
|
|
||
CLCAL | refant=1; |
|
|
|
|
Amplitude calibration solutions applied. |
FRING | docal -1; dparm 2,400,400,0.5,0;aparm(7)=0.1;solint 5,10,15 |
|
|
|
|
Full range searched |
SNEDT/CLCAL | refant=1;interp 'ambg'/'poly';intp 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
KRING | dofit 3;cparm 0.5,0,0,0.5,-1;solint 5/10;solm ''/'rd' |
|
|
|
|
|
CLCAL | refant=1; |
|
|
|
|
|
SPLIT | aparm(1)=2 0; |
|
|
|
|
Av within IF |
FITTP |
|
|
|
|
Data written out for analysis in Difmap amplitude |
AIPS Input Files
ANTAB.TXT | Comments used nominal_tsys.pl |
AIPS Output Files
Phase selfcal applied? | Yes |
Global amplitude selfcal (gscal) applied? | No |
Amplitude selfcal on non-global timescales used? | No |
Modelfit made and saved? | Yes |
Image Made and saved? | No |
Comments on Difmap processing
No much can be said, but I assumed that the ATCA flux was constant, that the source was simple, and fitted a point Gaussian to the data. |
Modelfit | ||||
Ampl, Phase vs (u,v) Distance PS (32 kb) JPEG (46 kb) |
Ampl, Phase vs Time PS (84 kb) JPEG 1, 2 |
(u,v) Coverage PS (17 kb) JPEG (26 kb) | Closure Phase vs Time PS (50 kb) JPEG 1 |
Image with model components PS (31 kb) JPEG (37 kb) |
More details on the Images and Modelfits are found in this page.