VS13a Results
Submitted checklist.txt and checklist.tex is also available
  [Summary | AIPS | Difmap ]
Analyst: William Scott
Date Prepared: 06-02-2004
 

Summary
 
Observation code : VS13a    AIPS Version : 31DEC00   
Date of Observation : 2002/204    Difmap Version : 2.3c 
Source Name : J0013+40    vsop_difmap used : Yes 
Calibration Source(s) : J0136+47,J0423-01         
Ground telescopes : Ka, Kl, Nt  Model Fitted to data : Yes 
Tracking Station(s) : UZ    Image made : Yes 
Correlator : Penticton         

 
Abstract
Model
Flux (Jy)
Radius (mas)
Theta (deg)
Major (mas)
Axial ratio
Phi (deg)
TB (10^12 K)
0.281986 0.0296551 -38.0964 0.766329 0.138879 -36.9713 0.1687
(*) Quoted Brightness temperatures assume Gaussian components and are in the local (z=0) frame.



AIPS Data Reduction Notes
 
Task
Adverbs
CL
in
SN
in
CL
out
SN
out
Comments
FITLD DIGICOR=DELCOR=-1
 
 
 
 
Output file name = VS13A.FITLD 
MSORT
 
 
 
 
Input file name = VS13a.FITLD, Output file name = VS13a.UVSRT 
FIXWT
 
 
 
 
Not done. 
INDXR CPARM(1)=3
CPARM(2)=60
CPARM(3)=0.25
 
 
 
 
Created NX(1), no CSEs 
ANTAB
 
 
 
 
For Nt used tsys=50. For HALCA used a Tsys of 88K, 92K. For Kz and Ka used nominal tys' of 50K and 171K respectively. 
APCAL
 
 
 
Input: Ty(1) + GC(1) 
CLCAL OPCODE = CALP
INTERPOL = 'AMBG'
REFANT 2 (Ka)
 
 
TBOUT INEXT = 'AN'
 
 
 
 
 
TBIN
 
 
 
 
Changed MNTSTA entries in the AN table. Changed Halca from 3 to 2. 
TBIN
 
 
 
Read in DQA1 delay and rate solutions. Decided to change the refant to Kalyazin (2). 
SNEDT
 
2, then 3 
 
Minor editting. 
CLCAL OPCODE = CALP
INTERPOL = 'AMBG'
REFANT 2 (Kz)
 
 
FRING DOCALIB 1
GAINUSE 3
TIMER 0
SOLINT 5
REFANT 2
SEARCH 1,3
APARM(1)=2
APARM(7)=3 (SNR=3)
DPARM(1)=3 (include baseline
   stacking)
DPARM(2)=100 (100 ns delay
   window)
DPARM(3)=20 (20mHz rate
   window)
DPARM(4)=0.5
DPARM(5)=0
DPARM(6)=1
 
 
 
 
Didn't bother running fring. DQA1 solutions looked good, and the last experiment I did VS09o had better possms without FRING than with FRING. 
SPLIT SOURCES
   'J0013+40.FITS,J0136+47.FITS,J0423-01.FITS'
DOCALIB 1, GAINUSE 3
 
 
 
Input file: VS13a.UVSRT, Output file: J0013+40.FITS, J0136+47.FITS, J0423-01.FITS 
FITTP
 
 
 
 
Input file: J0013+40.FITS, J0136+47.FITS, J0423-01.FITS Output file: J0013+40.FITS, J0136+47.FITS, J0423-01.FITS amplitude 

AIPS Input Files
ANTAB.TXT
INDXR.TXT
Comments
- None -

AIPS Output Files
DTSUM_0.LIS
DTSUM_1.LIS
LISTR.LIS
PRTAN.LIS
POSSM01_AP_1.PS
POSSM02_AP_1.PS
SN_APCAL_AMP_1.PS
SN_APCAL_AMP_2.PS
SN_CALIB_DEL_1.PS
SN_CALIB_DEL_2.PS
SN_CALIB_PHA_1.PS
SN_CALIB_PHA_2.PS
SN_CALIB_RAT_1.PS
SN_CALIB_RAT_2.PS
SN_CALIB_SNR_1.PS
SN_CALIB_SNR_2.PS
SN_FRING01_DEL_1.PS
SN_FRING01_DEL_2.PS
SN_FRING01_RAT_1.PS
SN_FRING01_RAT_2.PS
SN_FRING01_SNR_1.PS
SN_FRING01_SNR_2.PS
SN_FRING02_DEL_1.PS
SN_FRING02_DEL_2.PS
SN_FRING02_RAT_1.PS
SN_FRING02_RAT_2.PS
SN_FRING02_SNR_1.PS
SN_FRING02_SNR_2.PS
UVPLT_UV.PS
UVPLT_UVD.PS
UVPLT_UVPA.PS
VPLOT_AP_1.PS
VPLOT_AP_2.PS
WEIGHTS.PS
IMAGE.FITS



Difmap Data Reduction Notes
Phase selfcal applied? Yes
Global amplitude selfcal (gscal) applied? No
Amplitude selfcal on non-global timescales used? No
Modelfit made and saved? Yes
Image Made and saved? Yes
Comments on Difmap processing
Visibility amplitudes for the source seems a little low by about a half (based upon the PLS). However, amps of both calibrators seem about right. So assume the diff in amplitude of the source is just due to variability. Not really any good crossing points.

Image
Ampl, Phase vs (u,v) Distance
PS (64 kb)
JPEG (52 kb)
Ampl, Phase vs Time
PS (168 kb)
JPEG 1, 2
(u,v) Coverage
PS (34 kb)
JPEG (33 kb)
Closure Phase vs Time
PS (116 kb)
JPEG 1
Clean Image
PS (42 kb)
JPEG (46 kb)
Modelfit
Ampl, Phase vs (u,v) Distance
PS (64 kb)
JPEG (52 kb)
Ampl, Phase vs Time
PS (168 kb)
JPEG 1, 2
(u,v) Coverage
PS (34 kb)
JPEG (33 kb)
Closure Phase vs Time
PS (115 kb)
JPEG 1
Image with model components
PS (40 kb)
JPEG (40 kb)

More details on the Images and Modelfits are found in this page.

Model
Flux (Jy)
Radius (mas)
Theta (deg)
Major (mas)
Axial ratio
Phi (deg)
TB (10^12 K)
0.281986 0.0296551 -38.0964 0.766329 0.138879 -36.9713 0.1687
(*) Quoted Brightness temperatures assume Gaussian components and are in the local (z=0) frame.



Last updated on Wed Aug 25 07:07:32 GMT 2004
by db_results.pl version 0.3.