VS09O Results
Submitted checklist.txt and checklist.tex is also available
  [Summary | AIPS | Difmap ]
Analyst: William Scott
Date Prepared: 28-01-2004
 

Summary
 
Observation code : VS09O    AIPS Version : 31DEC00   
Date of Observation : 2002/357    Difmap Version : 2.3c 
Source Name : J0253-54    vsop_difmap used : Yes 
Calibration Source(s) : J0334-40,J0635-75         
Ground telescopes : Mp, Ho, Hh  Model Fitted to data : Yes 
Tracking Station(s) : UZ    Image made : Yes 
Correlator : Penticton         

 
Abstract
Model
Flux (Jy)
Radius (mas)
Theta (deg)
Major (mas)
Axial ratio
Phi (deg)
TB (10^12 K)
0.806031 0.172841 -106.997 0.260630 1.00000 -13.5702 0.5791
1.13723 2.07956 30.2235 1.14182 1.00000 0.00000 0.0426
(*) Quoted Brightness temperatures assume Gaussian components and are in the local (z=0) frame.



AIPS Data Reduction Notes
 
Task
Adverbs
CL
in
SN
in
CL
out
SN
out
Comments
FITLD DIGICOR=DELCOR=-1
 
 
 
 
Output file name = VS09O.FITLD 
MSORT
 
 
 
 
Input file name = VS09O.FITLD, Output file name = VS09O.UVSRT 
FIXWT
 
 
 
 
Not done. 
INDXR CPARM(1)=3
CPARM(2)=60
CPARM(3)=0.25
 
 
 
 
Created NX(1), no CSEs 
ANTAB
 
 
 
 
For Ho used tsys=175, DPFU=0.1. Had measured tsys values for Mp and Hh. For HALCA used a Tsys of 88K, 92K. 
APCAL
 
 
 
Input: Ty(1) + GC(1) 
SNEDT
 
 
2 then 3 
Editted some anomalous Tsys' 
CLCAL OPCODE = CALP
INTERPOL = 'AMBG'
REFANT 2 (Ho)
 
 
TBOUT INEXT = 'AN'
 
 
 
 
 
TBIN
 
 
 
 
Changed MNTSTA entries in the AN table. Changed Halca from 3 to 2, and changed Ho and Hh to 0. 
TBIN
 
 
 
Read in DQA1 delay and rate solutions. 
SNEDT
 
 
Extremely minor editting. 
CLCAL OPCODE = CALP
INTERPOL = 'AMBG'
REFANT 2 (Ho)
 
 
FRING DOCALIB 1
GAINUSE 3
TIMER 0
SOLINT 5
REFANT 2
SEARCH 1,3
APARM(1)=2
APARM(7)=3 (SNR=3)
DPARM(1)=3 (include baseline
   stacking)
DPARM(2)=100 (100 ns delay
   window)
DPARM(3)=20 (20mHz rate
   window)
DPARM(4)=0.5
DPARM(5)=0
DPARM(6)=1
 
 
Solutions looked ok...but there was more scatter in these solutions than in the DQA1 solutions. Use DQA1 solutions instead. Possms for these solutions also looked worse than the possms from the DQA1 solutions. 
SPLIT SOURCES 'J0253-54'
DOCALIB 1, GAINUSE 4
 
 
 
Input file: VS09O.UVSRT, Output file: J0253-54.FITS, J0334-40,J0635-75.FITS 
FITTP
 
 
 
 
Input file: J0253-54.FITS, J0334-40,J0635-75.FITS Output file: J0253-54.FITS, J0334-40,J0635-75.FITS amplitude 

AIPS Input Files
ANTAB.TXT
INDXR.TXT
Comments
- None -

AIPS Output Files
DTSUM_0.LIS
DTSUM_1.LIS
LISTR.LIS
PRTAN.LIS
POSSM01_AP_1.PS
POSSM02_AP_1.PS
SN_APCAL_AMP_1.PS
SN_APCAL_AMP_2.PS
SN_CALIB_DEL_1.PS
SN_CALIB_DEL_2.PS
SN_CALIB_PHA_1.PS
SN_CALIB_PHA_2.PS
SN_CALIB_RAT_1.PS
SN_CALIB_RAT_2.PS
SN_CALIB_SNR_1.PS
SN_CALIB_SNR_2.PS
UVPLT_UV.PS
UVPLT_UVD.PS
UVPLT_UVPA.PS
VPLOT_AP_1.PS
VPLOT_AP_2.PS
WEIGHTS.PS



Difmap Data Reduction Notes
Phase selfcal applied? Yes
Global amplitude selfcal (gscal) applied? No
Amplitude selfcal on non-global timescales used? No
Modelfit made and saved? Yes
Image Made and saved? Yes
Comments on Difmap processing
Looking at calibrator J0635-75 the short spacing amplitude looked to be low by about a factor of 8 (Ho, Mp baseline). For the target source, crossing points with Ho and Mp to other baselines were also out by a factor of 8 (Mp was low). ANTAB file for Mp looked ok!?! Nevertheless, multiplied up Mp by a factor of 8 with scalant to make the radplots sane.

Image
Ampl, Phase vs (u,v) Distance
PS (34 kb)
JPEG (38 kb)
Ampl, Phase vs Time
PS (127 kb)
JPEG 1, 2
(u,v) Coverage
PS (19 kb)
JPEG (26 kb)
Closure Phase vs Time
PS (100 kb)
JPEG 1
Clean Image
PS (39 kb)
JPEG (48 kb)
Modelfit
Ampl, Phase vs (u,v) Distance
PS (34 kb)
JPEG (38 kb)
Ampl, Phase vs Time
PS (126 kb)
JPEG 1, 2
(u,v) Coverage
PS (19 kb)
JPEG (26 kb)
Closure Phase vs Time
PS (100 kb)
JPEG 1
Image with model components
PS (46 kb)
JPEG (42 kb)

More details on the Images and Modelfits are found in this page.

Model
Flux (Jy)
Radius (mas)
Theta (deg)
Major (mas)
Axial ratio
Phi (deg)
TB (10^12 K)
0.806031 0.172841 -106.997 0.260630 1.00000 -13.5702 0.5791
1.13723 2.07956 30.2235 1.14182 1.00000 0.00000 0.0426
(*) Quoted Brightness temperatures assume Gaussian components and are in the local (z=0) frame.



Last updated on Wed Aug 25 07:28:15 GMT 2004
by db_results.pl version 0.3.